Access Advisory – Adults-Only Website
You are about to enter gayporntube, a website that contains explicit material
(pornography). Access to this site is strictly restricted to individuals who meet the following
requirements:
- You must be at least 18 years old, or the legal age of
majority in your jurisdiction, whichever is greater.
- By entering, you represent and warrant that you will not allow any minor access to this website
or its services.
- You acknowledge and accept full responsibility for your actions while using this website.
Parental Advisory
If you are a parent or guardian, it is your responsibility to ensure that age-restricted content is
not accessible to minors under your care. We strongly encourage the use of parental control
tools and other protective measures to block access to this site.
gayporntube utilizes the "Restricted To Adults" (RTA) website
label, making it compatible with filtering software and parental controls.
Legal Disclaimer
By entering gayporntube, you confirm that you meet the legal requirements for
accessing this site. gayporntube disclaims any liability for:
- Misrepresentation of age by users.
- Failure to implement parental controls or other protective measures by parents or guardians.
The platform is not responsible for any unauthorised or improper use of its content. Parents and
guardians bear full responsibility for ensuring minors do not access this site.
@ZigZag @C4leb @all: GPT Monitor Blog Notification + 404 Blog UserScript (GPTMBN404)
Important: The update from GPTMBN to GPTMBN404 will run in 2 steps, so might take 2 update cycles to take full effect (or do manual update twice).
If you want to download/install the new version directly (need to deactivate/delete the old version first in that case!): https://gist.github.com/verydelight/40f005ac85d1d48f3e7281c24359c955/raw/gptmbn404.user.js
Features:
- Shows on-site notifications for new comments & replies in Monitor Blog and 404 Blog
- Notifications integrated into the regular on-site notification mechanism
- Integrates links to Monitor Blog and 404 Blog into User Menu (drop-down) with notification counts
- If Monitor Blog or 404 Blog are visited marks-up new Comments, Comments with new replies and new Replies since last visit
Known bugs:
- Multiple instances (tabs) of the same blog at different times/status will cause notification count issues (e.g. one 404 tab open since yesterday, a new one open today, if posting something in the tab from yesterday and then refresh or post in the tab from today will cause a wrong count and mark-up in the new tab (based on the tab-instance from yesterday).
- Not actually a bug: Initial notification count will be 150+ until you have visited the 2 blogs (need to be on the blogs to take a "snapshot" of what you have actually seen already to determinate what is new in the future).
Notification (integrated, including monitor blog and 404):

Activity mark-up - The response from the test-account is new, so it marks up the comment that has a new response and the new response itself:

BOLO https://www.gayporntube.com/user/Ilovepisspr
"DM looking to trade teleguard EB594C7DQ Im into younger boys & girls."
1. Please don't display that you use services such as Telegram, Teleguard or other social media services. Use of such services can be construed by third-party observers as enabling illicit file-sharing. Perhaps replace it with "DM me for contact" or similar, and put your details in your About Me section.
2. Please don't suggest that you wish to swap, exchange or trade. Such suggestions may be construed as conducting illicit file-sharing by third-party observers, attracting unwanted attention to GPT.
3. Your preferences have been noted and your account will be monitored closely.
Congratulations, trifecta! You've just made it onto a list!"
C4LEB
Please don't display that you use services such as Telegram, Teleguard, or other social media services. Third-party observers can construe the use of such services as enabling illicit file sharing. Perhaps replace it with "DM me for contact" Or similar, and put your details in your About Me section.
Most of the time, I get a good reply when I send members a PM. But then you get that one person why ask "why"?
Didn't I just tell you?
I still dont get what's the difference of having them in "About me" vs. Title/Description.
If they put them in about me as "city" then the Messenger ID is directly displayed in the profile information - privacy/data protection is also no argument as "about me" is literally the same page as title/description (only hidden by style - that e.g. search engines dont care for, they see it just as normal data).
This complete messenger-rule is inconsistent and makes no sense at all. Either Messenger IDs should be allowed everywhere or only "DM me for contact" and no messenger IDs at all.
Try it urself: right-click on your comment above, select inspect, the inspector opens.
In the inspector move up a few lines to
<div id="custom_post_comments_post_comments_items" class="margin-fix">
double-click the margin-fix and replace it by hidden
Magic, all content on the monitor blog is gone. Just that is not gone, it is there, it just doesnt show. Now double click the hidden again and replace by margin-fix: All is back :)
This is exactly the mechanism how "about me" is displayed/not displayed (by toggling hidden in class). And google doesnt care if the class is "margin-fixed", "hidden", "fancy_rainbow_color_text", that is all looks only. It only cares about the data, not how it looks.
And as said: Put the messenger ID as City and you have it even more prominent compared to in title/description. Masses of users do that.
I thought this was a new "rule": not to display social media information that everyone was "inforcing"
Doesnt matter if new or from the bible. It's 100% idiot bullshit.
So are you calling me an idiot?
nope, the rule.
This is what I mean (keeping in mind that about-me is on every section of the profile - just not visibly displayed):

Yes, thank you for the frank assessment of my intellectual capacities, verydelight.
It's one way of reinforcing that GPT discourages the trade in underage material (even though it cannot enforce it) and that such facility does not go unnoticed.
Not everyone - read, hardly anyone - realises that such entries aren't out of sight (except to the digitally aware), and making the change reinforces the concept. It's a blunt tool, but as Candy points out, few question it.
I make no apologies for employing the strategy.
So if the user puts it in "City" (so it appears directly under the username - in image on position "Messenger is super OK here"): Do we approve or deny that?
Maybe I'm the 100% idiot because I dont understand the rule...
@ZigZag @all: Should I integrate the 404 Help Blog for notifications too?
In my DEVEL version of GPTMBN I have also integrated the 404 Blog, integrated the notifications into the regular notifications (the blue one), and added markup for the blogs so one can directly see where something is new.
Notification (integrated, including monitor blog and 404):

Activity mark-up - The response from the test-account is new, so it marks up the comment that has a new response and the new response itself:

I'd be okay with that.
Fine by me.
https://www.gayporntube.com/video/2065549/emmawatsoons
https://www.showcamrips.com/model/en/emmawatsoons/
From what I can tell, that person is 26. Not sure members here will like that kind of content.
Its a biological male, whats the problem?
Arent you normally defending str8 content?
I see no problem. Someone else has complained about it. Basically, a heads up
Some users...
What exactly was the complaint? "Head looks like a girl"?
One person actually thought she was underage
Beta2720
Has to be a problem on his end. I see everything on his profile
The problem wirth Beta2720 is that I dont even understand how he watches porn. C4leb had to send him a picture of a computer mouse and mark the right button to explain the concept of right-click... Because right-clicking is something only programmers and hackers can do :)
@ZigZagMan @all: If you want Notifications for the Monitors Blog
1) Install TamperMonkey (https://www.tampermonkey.net/) or any other UserScript Manager
2) Install the UserScript GPTMBN (GPT Monitor Blog Notification) into your UserScript Manager by visiting this link: https://gist.github.com/verydelight/40f005ac85d1d48f3e7281c24359c955/raw/gptmbn.user.js
What will it do?
1) Show a separate notification counter (red) for new comments/replies in the Monitor Blog
2) Implement a link to the Monitor Blog into your GPT User Menu (so no extra bookmark neccessary)
Any feedback or requests for features welcome, its just a quick & easy implementation. I could turn that thing into a full blog subscription tool where you can add your own blog subscriptions etc. to receive notifications.
Thank you!
Although this Blog is okay, I prefer the group emails. I have to check here to see if there have been any updates. With a group email, I get notified as soon as something is in my Inbox.
Why not just check this blog from time to time?
I do that because we don't get notifications about new messages.
I could UserScript a Monitors Only Blog Notification, but it would require to run: UserScript (Tampermonkey, Greasemonkey etc.), you would get a normal notification (like you get for messages, friend requests), together with integration of the blog into your user-menue (the drop down).
I dont know why all monitors are so reluctant with userscript...
Yeah, so I have that working: Notifications for the Monitors Blog.

Also want a mark-up of every new comment/response since your last visit? :)
*sigh* They keep trying it on.
It's been a while since I ran across any pictures of him and the others from that "agency".
It's one windmill that I'm happy to tilt at. Thank you for the confirmation that I'm making a difference.
Next problem/error: Posts of deactivated/suspended users stay on walls.
User maxim14s was just "deactivated" (I would guess for UA), but all his posts stay on walls, e.g. https://www.gayporntube.com/user/LuisZa4 2nd post.
@C4leb: You got him suspended for these wall posts - but suspension doesnt remove any of them - they all stay active...
But no more will be posted - we can mop up as necessary.
Sean, is there away of preventing this member https://www.gayporntube.com/user/maxim14s from mass posting?
(Ideally, I'd like his account suspended.)
These are the images he has distributed the last few days:
https://zupimages.net/up/25/39/uwvc.jpg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/25/onwh.jpg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/24/xhu8.png
https://zupimages.net/up/26/24/tsk1.jpeg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/24/qdnz.jpg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/24/wm47.jpg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/23/7ru9.jpg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/23/j2lu.jpg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/23/cvzh.jpg
https://zupimages.net/up/26/06/xup6.jpg
Looks like he's gone
He was one of my wall suspension test subjects...
Nick18 obliged me with suspension.
Suspension just doesnt help because all the wall posts (he got suspended for) stay on the walls....
This is what impunity looks like:
https://www.gayporntube.com/user/jp20young
Please delete this avatar
The "Deleted Images Still In User Favs"-Fix seems to work for deleted images - I notice massive number drops in some "collector accounts" - some to less than 10% of original number.
There are some cases where deleted favs still stay - I think because the ALBUM (not the image) was deleted.
Example (from user fav images):
Fav image: https://media-1-albums.gayporntube.com/galleries/3197245e99fb2746d64/5e99fc09bb51e.png
Fav Link: https://www.gayporntube.com/galleries/from-ian---1038767.html?image=84
This returns a 404 - I guess because the complete ALBUM was deleted.
Next step (basically same logic): Fixing the hotlinking of deleted images/albums :)
[Method: Route all gallery image requests through an imgserv.php and keep deletion status in Redis/Memcached. The image server performs a cache lookup only: If the album is marked deleted or the image in the album is marked as deleted, it returns a 301 redirect to a placeholder image; otherwise it serves the original image. This avoids database queries on image requests while preventing access to soft-deleted content via direct links or hotlinks.]
This also shows monitors do quite a good job in cleaning out images. It just looks way worse because deleted images still showed up in favs and are still hotlinking.
If the hotlinking issue is solved the problem will maybe/hopefully look way less prominent - at least I would expect so.
Would also make monitoring easier: If the image shows we know its not deleted, no need to blindly find the album first and look through it if it still exists in there.
Verydelight, Jordanjay, C4LEB - needs to be a site priority
Deleted images stay in User-Favs.
- Fix that for the future (if image/user/album is deleted/removed/suspended remove from all favs)
- General: Find a solution for "Deleted images still hotlink" (like an imgsrv.php). I find it hard to reprimand/delete people for posting images that are hosted on GPT. Some walls are full of child porn and quite every of the images is a "deleted" image on GPT...
Now it seems to be only 5 images left (plausible). The middle one (I
boys) throws a 404 though on click (I guess whole album was removed?)
Seems "normal delete"-case is fixed for fav images, "album delete"-case is still showing.
Sometimes when I remove a photo, the thumbnail also vanishes. Sometimes, more often than not, the thumbnail remains.
I made an analysis for the possible best-case effect of the "Cleanup Wall"-Feature for monitoring.
I used the wall of https://www.gayporntube.com/user/Snatcher12 as the base (I'm testing the "wall suspend" on him and 12 of his friends where it makes sense) and used a scraper:
- 351 pages
- 7022 wall posts
- 5399 of which are Mass Posts
- 7221 images were posted (took 3 hours to cursor-quickrate each of them into CLEARLY UA and NOT)
- 318 posts from the user himself
- of which 192 are CLEARLY* underage (not talking borderline etc.)
- 1382 other individual (or small massposters) posts
- from 78 different users
- of which 498 are CLEARLY underage (not talking borderline etc.)
- 85% (410) of these 498 CLEARLY underage posts are from only 16 other users
- All of them have regular exchange among each other on walls
- All of these 16 have walls full of UA and post that material on diverse other walls
- In average everyone of them does 2 posts per day on 28 other walls (only estimation as I have no method to find out all walls they post on)
- From the 607 identified UA posts on his wall 470 are hosted on GPT (the check if they are all "deleted" would take 20+ hours but probing shows the majority is "deleted").
So applying the wall cleanup to these 17 (16 major UA friends + wall owner) users (assuming similar walls) would remove an estimated 14.110 CLEARLY underage wall posts from just these 17 walls and an other 9.130 CLEARLY underage wall posts from other walls. And Snatcher12 with just 17 users is not even a big network... There are "groups" of over 200 users.
Doing that manually would take 142 hours net time, spread over 77 days because of the deletes-limit - just for Snatcher12, 16 of his friends and their friends.
*clearly underage: Like the examples I gave in this blog. KIDS.
Last night, I had a total of 4,200 videos. Right now it says 4198. Whoever removed my videos, please have the courtesy to let me know beforehand.
could have been me, sometimes get copyright or other requests and remove a few each day, many for Google as well same reason
will watch out more I'm sorry man
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Corrigan#:~:text=In%20September%202005%2C%20Lockhart%20publicly,in%2011%20states%2C%20including%20California.
Yes, 2 weeks ago I made a PSA abouit this. The wiki is incomplete, it only mentiones the 4 video/VHS tape releases, there a 2 more productions containing underage Brent - this is by the records of validated birth date vs. production dates (not release dates):
PSA for USERS and MONITORS:
The following Cobra Video productions from 2004/2005 contain scenes featuring underage Brent Corrigan/Sean Lockhart. These productions/titles - or any scenes from them containing Brent Corrigan/Sean Lockhart - must not be uploaded and existing copies should be removed by monitors:
Every Poolboy's Dream
Schoolboy Crush
Bareboned Twinks
Casting Couch 4
Cream BBoys
Naughty Boy's Toys
(Thanks to Akuro for helping to research all affected titles)
@Nick: Request: "WALL CLEANUP"-Feature
I'm still in full frustration mode about underage walls... I have 20 walls on my list that are full with UA material (posted and received), most of them 350+ pages so 7000+ posts to go through. Most of them mass-post-cancer. Dickzucker2, Bluelines, Duchenozzle alone produce up to 250.000 wall posts PER DAY together.
What I would like to have is a "WALL CLEANUP" Function it should:
- Delete every post by that user on his own wall.
- Delete every post by that user on any other wall.
Examples - Go through them, they are full of children. It is already impossible to even clean the single user wall manually - not talking about 100s of friends where they posted the same images (and not mentioning that they are all DELETED images and should not hotlink at all...):
- https://www.gayporntube.com/user/snatcher12
Children (hosted on GPT): https://media-1-albums.gayporntube.com/galleries/2915195f5b849f4510d/5f5b84d45ac31.jpg
Hosted on GPT: https://media-1-albums.gayporntube.com/galleries/2207355a932dbed68b0/5a932e51a1d72.jpg
Hosted on GPT: https://media-1-albums.gayporntube.com/galleries/12105620c5652a1521/620c570fcaa48.jpg
- https://www.gayporntube.com/user/peladero
Naked children (hosted on GPT): https://media-1-albums.gayporntube.com/galleries/3166265df4b3669cf01/5df4b37e5463e.jpg
Naked children under 10 (hosted on GPT): https://media-1-albums.gayporntube.com/galleries/2207355a932dbed68b0/5a932e51a1d72.jpg
You can just start at one wall and open ever underage post from a different user in a new window, then continue on that new users wall... After 10mins you have 20 tabs open with other walls full of children...
Just tp make clear: Dickzucker2, Bluelines do NOT post underage material, but you have to go through 50 posts from them before you find other users posts again.
Delight, are you the only one with this ability to "suspend a wall"?
I think DEV has created fix for these ghost wall posts, checking now
@Candy: Not a capability, just trickery. If you have candidates for it I'm happy to test further :)
@Nick18: These are not "Ghost Wall Posts", but "Ghost Images". The users/wall posts are not ghosts (not deleted), but the images are "deleted".
Still the "Wall Cleanup" feature would be a great help for monitoring because it is otherwise impossible to remove UA wall posts from a user:
- There may be 100s of pages from the users wall himself
- We have no way to see on what other wall he posted (except finding by accident)
So "Delete all Wall Posts" from a user on his own and other walls is the only plausible way to remove 1000s of UA posts... Alternative: Fix "Deleted images still hotlink", but that only solves posts with images on GPT, external images and data images will still stay. "Delete all Wall Posts" would solve that.
Brent Corrigan legal age check - A user pointed that out to me and it at least matches the affected productions where he was under 18. Can anyone confirm?

It's something to go by to determine his age. I guess.
Yes good idea
Can the public see this blog? worry would neglect the 404 blog
Welcome Boss :)
No public neither sees it in the lists (blogs page, my profile), nor its contents. At least not without effort.
Thank you I need some sleep now, guys. It's 1am