Access Advisory – Adults-Only Website
You are about to enter gayporntube, a website that contains explicit material
(pornography). Access to this site is strictly restricted to individuals who meet the following
requirements:
- You must be at least 18 years old, or the legal age of
majority in your jurisdiction, whichever is greater.
- By entering, you represent and warrant that you will not allow any minor access to this website
or its services.
- You acknowledge and accept full responsibility for your actions while using this website.
Parental Advisory
If you are a parent or guardian, it is your responsibility to ensure that age-restricted content is
not accessible to minors under your care. We strongly encourage the use of parental control
tools and other protective measures to block access to this site.
gayporntube utilizes the "Restricted To Adults" (RTA) website
label, making it compatible with filtering software and parental controls.
Legal Disclaimer
By entering gayporntube, you confirm that you meet the legal requirements for
accessing this site. gayporntube disclaims any liability for:
- Misrepresentation of age by users.
- Failure to implement parental controls or other protective measures by parents or guardians.
The platform is not responsible for any unauthorised or improper use of its content. Parents and
guardians bear full responsibility for ensuring minors do not access this site.
Monitors are volunteers, and operate screen-side (which is where members are). The brief for monitors is to keep the place clean, not to maintain it (that's a server-side job, where the developers are). Our first priority is to the site. Otherwise, we try to help out where we can, and to the level of our expertise - if we are unable to assist, then that's that; the next port of call is Nick18.
verydelight 2 months ago
It seems a pretty common user pattern that when you remove UA content and inform/reprimand them, they immediately seem to have a list of other UA content at hand to 'counter-report'.
I gratefully take and process it... And if I'm at it will process all their uploads, favs and friends too. Some users are better in detecting UA content/uploaders than my script :)
Make sure you know with whom you are speaking.
Maybe introduce urself as a Monitor?
Too much text and effort. We have discretion, if we think it is UA we can treat it as such. The user can provide the evidence of it beeing of age, he assured on upload that he is keeping all proper documentation. Stop stressing urself for nothing...
Still, just so everybody knows that I can and will take the time and effort as necessary to go wherever I must to establish the facts that support my position.
Lol, I had a weird conversation with him also. I noticed that his Profile Information needed to be approved. It was going on about mods and bla bla bla. He would not explain. So before I could give his PI a thumbs down, someone else did it.
... and sure enough, a confirmation from the photographer:
What a shmuck.
Ok, thats a new one...
Hello $username,
I'm verydelight, and a Monitor on gayporntube.com.
STOP SPAMMING OR YOUR ACCOUNT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY!
Reply:
Ok sorry didn't know that wasn't allowed
I'm confused beyond comparison :)
Aww, that's cute.
There are quite a lot of profiles out there listing diverse monitors as turn-off (or other), often obfuscated (e.g. "C4, VD")
According to some, you're "an asshole" or "that asshole". I prefer NukedAlfi's name for you: verydelete
Yesterday I told a member that the album of Sergei Yakovlev was not 18. He turns 18 in November.
His reply was "Nor a half the pics in your favorite". So I asked him, "Send me some links to the ones in my favs, and I will remove them."
Which he replied with "I haven't got the time to sit and do that".
And yes, I deleted that album.
That's why you are a Monitor and he is not :)
Also nice: "Must be a dream job to watch your favourite porn all day and get paid!"
That hurts a little :)
Thats a new one: "Please check with Nick before deleting my videos. Thank you."
*sigh*
I had one a couple of weeks ago that did the same thing lol.
Most of the time, when I approach someone about a video, picture, or avatar, they simply say "ok," and they move on.
Most members are grateful for a bit of direction with matters that they would otherwise not have considered, or not even been aware. You're right, usually the response amounts to "Okay" or "Thnx", or they shrug and move on. Job done.
Some with enquiring minds ask to be walked through the whys and wherefores, which I'm happy to do (as it is with all monitors, I shouldn't wonder).
Yet there are those for whom nothing less than 'heads on pikes' will suffice. This is one such complainant, who is now on a list and will be scrutinised with a good scrute, as they say in the Classics.
(Contrary to popular belief, 'monster' is not the root word for 'monitor', but some days it is.
)
In the interests of transparency and confidence of members in monitors to meet their commitments to their tasks as volunteers, this response to the videos cited as suspect assessed as per monitors' protocols:
• https://www.gayporntube.com/video/1223508/see-how-fast-this-naughty-boy-gets-his-dick-hard-boys-porn
- rado-ulnar epiphyses fully developed indicating at least 16+ years old;
- cranio-facial bones developed, no peri-orbital swelling; developed larynx;
- pubic hair spread away from the medial.
• https://www.gayporntube.com/video/1746899/sporty-boy-jerks-off
- rado-ulnar epiphyses fully developed indicating 16+ years old;
- cranio-facial developed, no peropi-orbital swelling; well developed larynx;
- axillary hair present;pubic hair spread away from the medial and evident to the scrotum;
- aureole dark and delineated; characteristic 'V' shape consistent with post-pubertal musculo-skeletal growth ratios.
• https://www.gayporntube.com/video/1252997/look-at-me-hard-cock-boys-porn
- cranio-facial bones fully developed, no peropi-orbital swelling;
- axillary hair present;pubic hair spread away from the medial and evident to the scrotum;
- aureole dark and delineated; characteristic 'V' shape consistent with post-pubertal musculo-skeletal growth ratios.
Any body else want to infer that monitors are biased, short-sighted or incompetent?
Addenda *come on (not 'cone on') * peri-orbital