's Blogs

• https://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/why-young-men-are-turning-to-circumcision-20200228-p545hd.html

I did never say cutted boys can't have good orgasms! I only mean that cut boys must wank longer and stronger to get an orgasm! Is there anyone who knows the difference in sensitiveness / feelings before and after circumcision at his own penis?

I’m against circumcision. But I must say, I’ve never met any circumcised guy who complains about his dick not feeling good enough when he masturbates or has sex. He wouldn’t know the difference you would say. Ok… but right now as I masturbate while typing on my phone, my dick not only feels incredibly good, but I’m easily able to navigate my penis through all the different phases of arousal and stimulation backwards and forwards as long as I want and into the very complicated orgasm sequence. We can all do this when circumcised. if circumcision damages boys penises, you would think that the entire stimulation / erection / increased pleasure however close to orgasm but not over the edge / and finally triggering orgasm / would also be damaged or not work properly.

Oh mein Gott Leute, macht euch bloß nicht ins Hemd, wie kann man nur so verbohrt sein alles abzuschnippeln zu müssen was als Schutzhülle gedacht ist! Nur weil Millionen es in der Vergangenheit gemacht haben? Wenn Pappi so blöd war sich die Vorhaut wegraspeln zu lassen soll es der Junior auch nicht besser haben, was? Und um ganz sicher zu gehen am besten schon beim hilflosen Säugling alles wegschaben, bevor er sich als Junge noch dagegen wehren kann! Stellt euch vor, man kann doch tatsächlich die Vorhaut zum wichsen zurückziehen, man muß sie gar nicht zurückschneiden! *************** Oh my God folks, just don't get/shit into your shirt, how can you be so stubborn to have to snipping off everything that is meant to be a protective cover! Just because millions have done it in the past? If daddy was so stupid to let the foreskin shave away, the junior should not have it better, what? And to be quite sure, it is best to scrape everything away from the helpless infant before he can still defend himself against it as a boy! Imagine, you can actually withdraw the foreskin to jerk off, you do not have to cut it back!

Uncut, how the evolution made it!

Hello Pinkbarbie,

Since you asked about the circumcision rate in the USA I decided to do a little research and see what I would come up with. I am not going to weigh in on the religious aspects and I think it is pretty generally known the some faiths encourage it and some don't. 

Apparently whether or not a newborn boy is circumcised depends more on which U.S. state he is born in than religion or ethnicity. Boys born in the highest rate states of Kentucky, Indiana, Iowa, Ohio and Michigan are 80 percent likely to be "cut" at birth. If you look at the Southwestern states of Nevada, Arizona and California, the chances drop down to less then 25 percent. I was really surprised by this fact and it was not at all what I guessed was the major factor. 

The overall rate (average) for U.S. boys who are circumcised is 57 percent. 

As someone born in the U.S. in the 1960's I can tell you that nearly all boys were circumcised during the 1950's, 60's, 70's and into the 80's. This didn't start to change until the 1990's.  I didn't see an uncut young man until I was at my first year in university. Most of the young parents that I know cut their sons for two reasons; the first, religious teachings and second, because the boys father is also cut. 

I am cut, but my sons are not. My brother is cut, and his sons are as well. Having been cut right after birth I have no idea what it is like to have a foreskin and often wonder what it would be like. Here is a link to the article I used to find this information.  

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/circumcision-rates-by-state

----Luke

Bla bla bla, it's necessary to prevent closing this blog!

It's a stupid religious thing. Then all logic is overboard.

I didn't have much say on the matter.     Didn't see my first uncut till i was 16 in HS. We showered after gym for for over 5 yrs. never saw one... First was an exchange student from Germany.   

i dont know about others that have been circumsized/snipped--but ifbeing uncut makes cock more sensitive then i am glad to be cut-- because my cock is still very sensitive

This topic is a regular on the GBT blogs... one reason not mentioned so far is the few hundred bucks more it brings on the bill for to the proceeding of boys birth in the US. Are poorer people (and minorities) less circumcised in the US? I don't check this every day, and did not before writing this. But certainly worth a look.

As for the society where I live, the older ''Gills'' (I'm one of those) were all circumcised, in accordance with our Catholic priests and their ''biblical'' models. We happily discarded their influence in the sixties... And the new little ''Gills'' are not, the tacit understanding among obstetricians being: ''If they don't ask for it, forget it''.

Uncut

This is sadly impossible for the most boys from the states!

At the moment i don't have new stuff! This posting prevents the blog to become closed, lol!

If there was no tradition of cutting away the foreskin, no one in sane mind would introduce such a scheme today. 

@ Caleb :

I studied Arabic and spent several years in Arab countries. It was at those universities that I learned that many regulations were dictated by everyday life and the conditions that were given a thousand years ago.
For example:
- polygamy resulted from the fact that the tribes of that time waged endless wars and skirmishes and there was simply a shortage of men (many died in the fights) who could take care of women;
- the prohibition of eating pork was due to the fact that pork deteriorates rapidly in hot climate and becomes deadly, while beef and mutton only dry out in the sun;
- two glasses of whiskey drunk today in hot climates will get you drunk faster than a quarter of vodka that you drink in winter in Sweden or Siberia - hence the ban on drinking alcohol;
- Gambling is also ruining many families today, so it had to be banned (it's a pity Christianity didn't forbid it)

Another example - this time not very happy religious law is celibacy order for Catholic priests, not given from God, but introduced in the 11th century by Pope Gregory XVII.
The final date confirming the obligation of celibacy of Catholic priests is sometimes recognized as late as 1917, when the new Canon Code was introduced. In any case, the introduction of celibacy was gradual, there is no one certain breakthrough date.

What celibacy has brought about, we learn from new scandals that come to light.

I am not a religious expert, I only listen to those whom I consider smarter than me.

The tradition (obligation) of circumcision in the Islamic and Jewish religions was not inspired by God's commandments, but introduced by wise men into religion for hygienic reasons. In hot climates, with frequent lack of water and lack of any hygiene (who thought about hygiene a thousand years ago?), it was common among boys and men to inflamed the foreskin, which, if left untreated, even led to death in terrible suffering.
In European countries with a "better" climate there were no such problems on the same scale as in Asia or the East. There was also no Islamic influence, so the circumcision tradition did not take hold.
As for the US, I read a long time ago an article in Nesweek saying that circumcision had become popular there during ... the Korean and Vietnam wars. Soldiers going to war in the region of hot climate, mud, human shit in the fields (Korea) and poor sanitary conditions, like in the war, underwent this procedure. Then the practice of circumcision spread to the entire United States and its neighboring or dependent countries.
I don't know if it's true, but there is some sense in it.
I personally think that circumcision of children without medical necessity is a mistake.
Even with phimosis, complete circumcision is not always needed

I agree 100% with you PB. Circumcision is totally useless. My father was uncircumcised and lived a long life. I did not know he was not circumsized until he was a widower and dating a Jewish woman and I joked if he got serious he'd have to get cut a second time. He replied "a second time" I have not even been cut a first time. Obviously never caused him a problem.

"Globally, circumcision rates vary widely. Since both Jewish and Islamic religious traditions promote the procedure, circumcision rates are over 95 percent in parts of the Middle East. In Western Europe, where non-medical infant circumcision has become increasingly controversial, and children’s rights groups have proposed banning the circumcision of minors, rates are under 20 percent. “In much of the world, newborn circumcision is not primarily a medical decision,” wrote Dr. Freedman, in a 2016 paper on the circumcision debate. Even in the United States, he noted, where “parents may use the conflicting medical literature to buttress their own beliefs and desires,” most parents ultimately decide whether or not to circumcise for non-medical reasons. “There can be no doubt that religion, culture, aesthetic preference, familial identity and personal experience all factor into their decision,” Dr. Freedman wrote."

- https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/17/parenting/guides/circumcision-baby-boy.html